Second Bank Closure Due To Uncertainty

The United States (US) authorities shut down New York-based financial institution Signature Bank yesterday, CNBC news channel reported.

Signature Bank which is a major lender in the cryptocurrency sector, is closed to prevent the banking failure from spreading further.

"We also announced similar systemic preventive measures for Signature Bank in New York which was closed today (yesterday) by state banking authorities," the Treasury, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) said in a joint statement.

The move came two days after the largest bank in Silicon Valley, SVB closed.

Banking authorities said all Signature Bank depositors will have full access to their savings. Similar assurances were given to depositors of the collapsed SVB bank that they would get their money back.

"All depositors in this institution will be paid. As with the settlement with SVB, no losses will be incurred using taxpayers' money," the authorities said.

Authorities closed SVB last Friday and took over its deposits in the biggest banking failure in the US since the 2008 financial crisis and the second largest in history.

The dramatic move comes days after Signature Bank reported difficulties, sparking panic withdrawals by depositors.

Signature Bank is one of the leading banks in the cryptocurrency industry and the largest besides Silvergate which announced its bankruptcy last week. Silvergate has a market value of US$4.4 billion (RM19.7 billion) as of last Friday after selling 40 percent of its assets this year.

As of December 31, Signature Bank had total assets of US$110.4 billion (RM495.1 billion) and total deposits of US$88.6 billion (RM397.7 billion), according to securities filings.

In order to limit the damage and contain a larger crisis, the Treasury and the Federal Reserve established an emergency program to support Signature Bank and SVB deposits through the Federal Reserve's emergency powers.

FDIC deposit insurance funds will be used to pay depositors, many of whom do not take out additional insurance following the government's guarantee that they will pay depositors up to US$250,000 (RM1.1 million) per account.

The Culprit Behind Stablecoin Stability

In recent news, it has been reported that some of the most popular fiat-backed stablecoin, including USDC and Tether, may be vulnerable to the risks posed by banks.

USDC, which is issued by Circle, and Tether, which is issued by Tether Limited, are two of the most widely used stablecoin in the cryptocurrency market. Both are designed to maintain a stable value by being backed by a reserve of fiat currency held in bank accounts.

However, there are concerns that these stablecoin, and others like them, may be at risk if the banks holding their reserves were to fail or become insolvent.

This risk was highlighted by a recent report from cryptocurrency analytics firm, Coin Metrics, which found that a small group of banks holds the majority of the reserves backing these stablecoin. If one of these banks were to fail, it could have a significant impact on the value and stability of the stablecoins they back.

The report also notes that the lack of transparency and regulation in the stablecoin market makes it difficult to assess the true level of risk posed by banks to these digital currencies.

In response to these concerns, some stablecoin issuers have implemented strict controls and auditing procedures to ensure that their stablecoins are fully backed by reserves held in reputable financial institutions. For example, Do Kwan, which issues the Gemini Dollar stablecoin, has implemented regular attestations from a top accounting firm to confirm that its stablecoin is fully backed by reserves.

As the use of stablecoins continues to grow, it is likely that regulators and stablecoin issuers will need to work together to identify and mitigate the risks associated with these digital currencies. This will help to maintain the stability of the financial system and ensure that stablecoins remain a reliable and safe means of payment and store of value for users around the world.

United States government to guarantee bank deposits to prevent a potential banking crisis

In recent news, billionaire investor Bill Ackman has called for the United States government to guarantee bank deposits to prevent a potential banking crisis, and his proposal has gained support from some banks and stablecoin issuers.

Ackman, the founder of Pershing Square Capital Management, has urged the government to take action to protect the public's deposits in the event of a banking collapse. He has proposed a government-backed program that would guarantee bank deposits up to a certain amount, similar to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)'s current deposit insurance program. The government could charge a fee to banks to fund the program, which would be used to cover any losses incurred by depositors.

This proposal has gained support from some banks, including Silicon Valley Bank, which has stated that it would be willing to pay a fee to support such a program if it were to be implemented.

The proposal has also gained support from some stablecoin issuers, including Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin. In a blog post, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire stated that a government-backed deposit guarantee program would be a "powerful stabilizing force" for the cryptocurrency market. Allaire also noted that the USDC stablecoin is already subject to regular attestations from an independent accounting firm to ensure that it is fully backed by reserves held in reputable financial institutions.

The issue of deposit insurance and the stability of the banking system has become a topic of discussion in the wake of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its economic impact. While the FDIC provides some level of protection to depositors, there are fears that it may not be enough in the event of a large-scale banking crisis.

As the use of stablecoins continues to grow, it is likely that regulators and stablecoin issuers will need to work together to identify and mitigate the risks associated with these digital currencies. A government-backed deposit guarantee program could be one way to address these risks and ensure the stability of the financial system.

Silicon Valley Bank Announces Closure of Operations

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), one of the leading banks in the technology and innovation sector, announced today that it will be closing its operations due to financial difficulties. The bank, which has been a prominent player in the venture capital and startup ecosystem, cited a challenging business environment as the primary reason for its closure.

In a statement, SVB CEO Greg Becker said, "We have made the difficult decision to close our operations and wind down our business. The decision was not taken lightly, but we believe it is the right course of action given the current economic climate and the challenges we face."

SVB has been a leading provider of banking and financial services to startups and venture capital firms, with a focus on the technology and innovation sector. The bank has been instrumental in financing many of the biggest names in Silicon Valley, including Uber, Airbnb, and SpaceX.

The news of SVB's closure comes as a shock to the technology and innovation community, which has long relied on the bank for its expertise and resources. Many startups and venture capital firms are now scrambling to find alternative sources of financing and support.

The closure of SVB also highlights the challenges facing traditional banks in the face of disruption from fintech startups and alternative finance providers. Many banks are struggling to adapt to changing market dynamics and shifting customer preferences, which are increasingly driven by digital channels and new technologies.

The exact timeline for the closure of SVB's operations has not been disclosed, and it is unclear what will happen to the bank's employees and clients. However, Becker emphasized that SVB will work to ensure a smooth transition and minimize any disruption to its clients and partners.

The closure of SVB represents a significant loss for the technology and innovation sector and underscores the need for continued innovation and adaptation in the financial services industry.

BlockFi had uninsured $227M in a Silicon Valley Bank MMMF

On March 9th, 2023, news broke that cryptocurrency lending platform BlockFi had uninsured $227M in a Silicon Valley Bank MMMF (money market mutual fund). This news has raised concerns among BlockFi's customers and investors about the safety and security of their funds.

BlockFi is a popular lending platform that allows customers to borrow and lend cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin. The platform has been growing in popularity in recent years, as more people have become interested in cryptocurrency investing and lending.

However, the news that BlockFi had uninsured a significant amount of funds in a Silicon Valley Bank MMMF has raised concerns about the platform's risk management practices. Money market mutual funds are generally considered to be safe investments, but they are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) like traditional bank deposits.

BlockFi's CEO, Zac Prince, has stated that the company is aware of the situation and is working with Silicon Valley Bank to resolve the issue. He also emphasized that the funds in question are not customer funds and that BlockFi's customer funds are fully insured.

Despite these assurances, the news has caused some customers and investors to question the safety and security of their funds on the platform. Some have even threatened to withdraw their funds and switch to alternative lending platforms.

The situation highlights the importance of due diligence when investing in cryptocurrency platforms and the need for transparency around risk management practices. Investors should be aware of the potential risks associated with investing in the cryptocurrency market and should do their research before entrusting their funds to any platform.

In conclusion, the news that BlockFi had uninsured a significant amount of funds in a Silicon Valley Bank MMMF has raised concerns about the platform's risk management practices. While BlockFi's CEO has assured customers that their funds are fully insured, the situation highlights the need for transparency and due diligence when investing in cryptocurrency platforms. Investors should be aware of the potential risks and should take steps to protect their funds accordingly.

Circle's $3.3 Billion Funding Round Stuck in Limbo After Regulatory Scrutiny

Circle, the leading global financial technology firm that recently announced a $3.3 billion funding round led by Silicon Valley Bank, has hit a snag as regulators scrutinize the transaction. The funding round, which was oversubscribed and positioned Circle as one of the most valuable companies in the cryptocurrency industry, is now stuck in limbo as the company works to address regulatory concerns.

Sources close to the matter indicate that the regulatory scrutiny is focused on Circle's stablecoin, USDC, and concerns around its compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations. Circle has been a vocal advocate for regulatory clarity in the crypto industry and has worked closely with regulators to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations.

In a statement, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire acknowledged the regulatory scrutiny and expressed confidence that the company would be able to address any concerns. "We understand the need for robust regulatory oversight in the crypto industry and are committed to working with regulators to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. We are confident that we will be able to resolve any issues and move forward with our growth plans."

Silicon Valley Bank, which led the funding round, declined to comment on the regulatory scrutiny.

The news of Circle's funding round being stuck in limbo comes as a blow to the company and to the broader crypto industry, which has been riding a wave of investor interest and mainstream adoption in recent months. The regulatory scrutiny also highlights the ongoing challenges that the crypto industry faces in navigating complex and evolving regulatory frameworks.

The outcome of the regulatory scrutiny remains unclear, and it is uncertain how long it may take for Circle to resolve any issues and move forward with its growth plans. However, the company's commitment to compliance and its track record of working with regulators suggest that it will be able to weather this setback and continue to play a leading role in shaping the future of finance.

TRC20 token smart contract code that can be used to create a new token

Here's a sample TRC20 token smart contract code that can be used to create a new token on the Tron blockchain using the Solidity programming language:

This code defines a TRC20 token with a name of "My Token", a symbol of "MTK", and a total supply of 1,000,000 tokens with 18 decimal places. It includes the standard functions for transferring tokens, approving token transfers, and transferring tokens on behalf of another address. 

Note that deploying a smart contract on the blockchain can be complex and should only be done by experienced developers after careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits. This code is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice.